Ajeet Rai vs Tai Sach Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W L L
Form
W W L W L W L W W LHead-2-Head: Rai 2 - 0 Sach
They have played 5 sets in total, with Rai winning 4 and Sach winning 1. The last match between Rai and Sach was at the M15 Wellington, 14-12-2024, Final, Hard with Ajeet Rai getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ajeet Rai | 2 |
| Tai Sach | 0 |
| Rai | Stats | Sach |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (9-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (9-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 475 | Ranking | N/A |
| 417 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (189-147) | Career Total W/L | 58% (117-86) |
| $3,445 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Noskova VS Carle PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Samsonova VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 5-7 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Ajeet Rai
Player
Tai Sach
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
105)
15
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
35 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 21 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:17:0 | Average Match Time | 1:17:0 |
| 66% (70/106) | 1st Serve % | 65% (68/105) |
| 69% (48/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (45/68) |
| 64% (23/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 38% (40/105) | Return Points Win % | 33% (35/106) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ajeet Rai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Ajeet Rai
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Benjamin O'Connell
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
40
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Stefan Storch
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Charlton
Player
Ajeet Rai
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Cade Birrell
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
8
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
9
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Ajeet Rai
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
76%
(
29 of
38)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Hyeon Chung
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
10
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Ajeet Rai
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
5
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tai Sach Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yuto Oki
Player
Tai Sach
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(6) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Tai Sach
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tai Sach
Player
Hiromasa Koyama
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Tai Sach
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tai Sach
Player
Ryo Tabata
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tai Sach
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (189/147) | Win/Loss | 58% (117/86) |
| 56% (425/332) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (264/193) |
| 53% (3693/3297) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2402/2090) |
| 57% (161/123) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (112/80) |
| 56% (18/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (9/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1644 | Aces Total | 353 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 789 | Total Double Faults | 302 |
| 1:25:31 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 468.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 225.87 |
| 60% (11408/18918) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4550/7510) |
| 71% (8062/11408) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3076/4550) |
| 49% (3681/7512) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1443/2960) |
| 42% (780/1851) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (311/765) |
| 40% (7451/18841) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3099/7735) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (2/9) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (20/29) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 61% (166/104) | Futures W/L | 58% (117/85) |
| 58% (181/314) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (116/202) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (43/86) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (27/47) |
| 49% (43/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (21/53) |
| 84% (195/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (122/107) |
| 15% (195/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (122/15) |
| 17% (141/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (80/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
